Latest News

Court Agrees 'Too Much, Too Soon' Plea Court Agrees 'Too Much, Too Soon' Plea
Assisted Signature Case Decided by Court of Appeal Assisted Signature Case Decided by Court of Appeal
Scots Change Intestacy Law Scots Change Intestacy Law
Executors Pay Price for Intransigence Executors Pay Price for Intransigence
Settlement Does Not Prevent Will Challenge Settlement Does Not Prevent Will Challenge
Failure to Comply With Procedure Invalidates Will Failure to Comply With Procedure Invalidates Will
Sisters Lose Battle Over Father's Estate Sisters Lose Battle Over Father's Estate
Intention Sufficient Basis for Rectification of Will Intention Sufficient Basis for Rectification of Will
Father's Gifts to Daughter Challenged by Sister Father's Gifts to Daughter Challenged by Sister
Will Stands Against Challenge Will Stands Against Challenge

Trust Must Provide for Children from Bigamous Marriage

Years ago, it was common for a deed creating a trust for children to specify the beneficiaries as being ‘the legitimate children’ of the person setting up the trust.

Recently, the children of the 13th Duke of Manchester, by his bigamous marriage to a Californian woman, went to court to seek entitlement from the family trust, which contained a ‘legitimacy’ clause.

Under the Legitimacy Act 1959, children of a void marriage are to be treated as legitimate if either of the parties to the marriage believed that it was valid.

In the case in question, the mother of the two children did not know that the Duke, whom she ‘married’ in 1993, had failed to obtain a divorce, so did not realise that the marriage was void.

Strictly, the Act would apply only if the Duke had been domiciled in England at the time of the births of the children. However, since Australia and California (the only two other possible domiciles) both have similar legislation regarding the legitimacy of children of void marriages, the court ruled that their entitlement had been established.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.