Latest News

Hospital Must Detain Suicidal Patient Hospital Must Detain Suicidal Patient
Court Agrees 'Too Much, Too Soon' Plea Court Agrees 'Too Much, Too Soon' Plea
Obligation on Seller Sets Boundary Obligation on Seller Sets Boundary
Holiday Letting Property a Business, Not an Investment Holiday Letting Property a Business, Not an Investment
Benefit to Parents Not Sufficient Benefit to Their Son Benefit to Parents Not Sufficient Benefit to Their Son
Assisted Signature Case Decided by Court of Appeal Assisted Signature Case Decided by Court of Appeal
Package Tour or Travel Booking? Package Tour or Travel Booking?
Argument Over Strip of Land Settled by Court of Appeal Argument Over Strip of Land Settled by Court of Appeal
Shared Parental Responsibility and Divorce Shared Parental Responsibility and Divorce
Scots Change Intestacy Law Scots Change Intestacy Law

Six-Figure Settlement for Botched Heart Surgery

A North Somerset man has received a six-figure sum in compensation after a mistake during an operation on his heart led to him having to have a pacemaker fitted.

Steve Edwards, 51, an NHS manager from Weston-super-Mare, was undergoing treatment for an irregular heartbeat at Bristol Royal Infirmary in 2008. A piece of equipment slipped, causing a radio pulse to be applied to the wrong side of his heart. Mr Edwards, who was under heavy local anaesthetic during the operation, was shaken awake and told that he would need to have a pacemaker fitted, but said that it was only during an outpatient’s appointment 10 weeks after the operation that he realised something had gone wrong.

The incident has affected Mr Edwards’s self-esteem and left him traumatised, and he has also suffered from nightmares. He will have to undergo further surgery every seven years to replace the batteries in his pacemaker, a procedure which will carry more risks as he gets older. The pacemaker itself may also have to be replaced in the future.

Hospital staff initially denied that a mistake had been made. However, Bristol Royal Infirmary has since apologised to Mr Edwards and said that changes to policies and procedures have been made to prevent a recurrence of this sort of error. Mr Edwards has also received a six-figure sum in damages in an out-of-court settlement.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.