Latest News

Conduct Determines Legal Ownership Conduct Determines Legal Ownership
Government to Outlaw Squatting in Residential Premises Government to Outlaw Squatting in Residential Premises
House Sales - Replying to Enquiries House Sales - Replying to Enquiries
Wind Turbines - New Planning Regulations on the Way Wind Turbines - New Planning Regulations on the Way
Court Reversal for Vendor Who Didn't Know What He Had Sold Court Reversal for Vendor Who Didn't Know What He Had Sold
I Hear You Knocking (and Drilling and Sawing...) I Hear You Knocking (and Drilling and Sawing...)
Nuisance Claim Against Landfill Company Fails Nuisance Claim Against Landfill Company Fails
Buyer Loses Flat Because of Vendor's Error Buyer Loses Flat Because of Vendor's Error
Landlords Face Costs in Disputes Landlords Face Costs in Disputes
Misplaced Fence Leads to £20,000 Bill Misplaced Fence Leads to £20,000 Bill

What is a Tenant's Improvement?

The law allows any tenant (with some exceptions) who has lived in a property for more than three years under a lease of more than 20 years to apply to the Landlord to purchase the freehold. The purchase price is based on the open market value of the property.

The provisions of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (the relevant law) stipulate that the price paid by the tenant to purchase the freehold may be reduced if the tenant has carried out improvements to the property which have increased its value. The Act has been updated several times since its introduction.

In a recent case brought before the House of Lords, tenants sought to purchase the freehold of a property they occupied as a family house. The property had been let for many years during which time it had undergone considerable change, including the addition of an extra storey. It had been converted from a family house into flats. The tenants had converted the property back in stages so that it had once again become suitable for single occupancy. The tenants claimed that the reconversion works were improvements to the property that had increased its value and which, therefore, should be taken into account in calculating the reduction in price of the freehold. There was no dispute regarding the works done to add the extra storey.

The Lords accepted the tenants' view that 'improvements' within the meaning of the Act meant physical improvements rather than merely economic ones. Had the tenants not undertaken the conversion works, the property would have remained in the same state it had been in under multiple occupancy and would therefore not have been worth as much.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.