Latest News

Buyer Who Failed to Complete Must Pay for Loss of Value Buyer Who Failed to Complete Must Pay for Loss of Value
Three Days in Court the Result of Informal Arrangements Three Days in Court the Result of Informal Arrangements
Mortgage Debt Not Regulated by Consumer Credit Act 1974 Mortgage Debt Not Regulated by Consumer Credit Act 1974
National Trust Membership Rules Out Judge in Planning Dispute National Trust Membership Rules Out Judge in Planning Dispute
Court Provides Resolution to Potential Problem Court Provides Resolution to Potential Problem
Careless Talk Costs Land Careless Talk Costs Land
Reasonable Depends on Circumstances Reasonable Depends on Circumstances
The Perils of Incautious Auction Purchase The Perils of Incautious Auction Purchase
Non-Compliance With Court Order Leads to Fine Non-Compliance With Court Order Leads to Fine
Inaccurate Sale Particulars Lead to Repayment Order Inaccurate Sale Particulars Lead to Repayment Order

Government to Outlaw Squatting in Residential Premises

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has now published its response to the recent consultation on proposals to criminalise squatting. The consultation paper, entitled ‘Options for dealing with squatting’, received over 2,000 responses. As a first step, the Government is proposing to make squatting in residential properties a criminal offence.

The offence would be committed where a person:

  • was in the building as a trespasser having entered as such;
  • knew or ought to have known that he or she was a trespasser; and
  • was living or intending to live in the building.

Section 7 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 already makes it a criminal offence for a trespasser to fail to leave residential premises when required to do so by or on behalf of a ‘displaced residential occupier’ or a ‘protected intending occupier’. While this allows those who are effectively made homeless by squatters to take action, it does not protect landlords or owners of second homes.

At present, the Government is not planning to criminalise squatting in commercial premises. Part of the reason for this is to prevent the occupation of buildings during protest activities from being caught by the new legislation. Crispin Blunt, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, said, “Stopping short of criminalising squatting in non-residential buildings represents a balanced compromise. Squatters who occupy genuinely abandoned or dilapidated non-residential buildings will not be committing the new offence, although their actions will rightly continue to be treated as a civil wrong and they can still be prosecuted for offences such as criminal damage or burglary. Neither will students who occupy academic buildings or workers who stage sit-ins to protest against an employer be caught by the offence.”

The legislation will not apply in situations where the property has previously been occupied legitimately, such as where tenants fall behind with their rent payments.

If you are having problems with unauthorised use of your property, contact us for advice.
View my profile
Jacinta Walmsley
Partner/Team Manager
T: 01743 237617 (DDI)
E:  
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.