Latest News

If You do Not Understand it, Take Advice If You do Not Understand it, Take Advice
HMRC Tighten Property Ownership Disclosure HMRC Tighten Property Ownership Disclosure
IHT Planning Exercise Fails Due to Covenants IHT Planning Exercise Fails Due to Covenants
Equitable Compensation to be Tax Free Equitable Compensation to be Tax Free
HMRC to Name and Shame 'Dodgy' Tax Advisers HMRC to Name and Shame 'Dodgy' Tax Advisers
Businessman UK Resident Despite HMRC Guidance Businessman UK Resident Despite HMRC Guidance
NS&I Withdraws Savings Certificates NS&I Withdraws Savings Certificates
Working Abroad and Tax Residence Working Abroad and Tax Residence
Changes to US Estate Tax Changes to US Estate Tax
Radical changes to taxation system proposed by IFS Radical changes to taxation system proposed by IFS

IHT Determined by Open Market Value

A recent case illustrates that HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will often vigorously challenge potentially low asset valuations for Inheritance Tax (IHT) purposes.

HMRC disputed the probate value of a property, which had been valued by two different valuers at £250,000 at the date of death of the owner in 2005. The problem was that the property had been bought for £268,450 in 2002 and in the intervening period house prices had risen. However, the 2002 purchase took place because the deceased was desperate to live near his daughter and had done a private deal with one of her neighbours to achieve that end.

HMRC proposed that a valuation of £350,000 be adopted for probate purposes and, after considerable negotiations, reduced this to £275,000. There was no further compromise, so the matter ended up in the Upper Tribunal.

The executors of the estate won. The Tribunal considered that HMRC were wrong to take the 2002 valuation as their starting point as there were 2005 valuations to hand, especially as there was considerable evidence that the 2002 deal was not an ‘open market’ purchase.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.