Latest News

Benefit to Parents Not Sufficient Benefit to Their Son Benefit to Parents Not Sufficient Benefit to Their Son
Shared Parental Responsibility and Divorce Shared Parental Responsibility and Divorce
Unreasonable Behaviour Leads to Access Limitation Unreasonable Behaviour Leads to Access Limitation
Divorce and Family Location Divorce and Family Location
Prison for Man Who Took Child Abroad Prison for Man Who Took Child Abroad
Unrecorded Marriage Can Still be Terminated Unrecorded Marriage Can Still be Terminated
C'est Bon, Le Pre-Nup C'est Bon, Le Pre-Nup
Lotto Win Not Part of Family Assets Lotto Win Not Part of Family Assets
Swiss Assets Unfrozen by Court Swiss Assets Unfrozen by Court
Children's Interests Need to be Assessed Individually Children's Interests Need to be Assessed Individually

Lotto Win Not Part of Family Assets

A court ruling that a spouse’s lottery winnings were not ‘matrimonial property’ so were not subject to the usual rule of equal division between the spouses when the marriage broke up received much publicity recently.

The normal rule on divorce is that matrimonial property (assets built up during the marriage) is to be divided equally. Non-matrimonial property (normally assets brought into the marriage or inherited by one party during the marriage) is not subject to the equality principle.

Although this case has been seized upon by some commentators to mean that if you win the lotto you can part from your spouse or civil partner and be sure of retaining your winnings, the reality is not so clear-cut.

The case was decided by Mr Justice Mostyn. Neither party was legally represented, neither spoke English and the precedent case law stemmed from Australia.

In 1999, the wife and a friend won £1 million in a lottery and this they divided equally. She apparently did not tell her husband about her good fortune, but did use the money to buy them a house.

The couple’s marriage appears to have been in difficulty for some years before divorce proceedings were commenced, and they were divorced in 2006.

The court hearing was to determine the financial settlement between them. Both have low-paying jobs and the husband is nearing retirement. On the basis of needs, the judge ordered the wife to pay her ex-husband £85,000.

The facts in this case were highly unusual and it may well be that a different conclusion would be reached in different circumstances.

Click here for guidance on divorce and money.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.