Latest News

Benefit to Parents Not Sufficient Benefit to Their Son Benefit to Parents Not Sufficient Benefit to Their Son
Shared Parental Responsibility and Divorce Shared Parental Responsibility and Divorce
Unreasonable Behaviour Leads to Access Limitation Unreasonable Behaviour Leads to Access Limitation
Divorce and Family Location Divorce and Family Location
Prison for Man Who Took Child Abroad Prison for Man Who Took Child Abroad
Unrecorded Marriage Can Still be Terminated Unrecorded Marriage Can Still be Terminated
C'est Bon, Le Pre-Nup C'est Bon, Le Pre-Nup
Lotto Win Not Part of Family Assets Lotto Win Not Part of Family Assets
Swiss Assets Unfrozen by Court Swiss Assets Unfrozen by Court
Children's Interests Need to be Assessed Individually Children's Interests Need to be Assessed Individually

Inherited Wealth Not Split on Divorce

A recent divorce case has confirmed the general position that when wealth is inherited, it is not normally subject to the ‘equal shares’ rule that applies to assets built up during a marriage.

The case involved a couple who married in the UK in 1991 after an earlier marriage ceremony in Israel in 1987. The wife had inherited shares worth £700,000 at the time of their UK marriage. By the time the marriage had broken up and the financial settlement was being negotiated, the shares were worth £57 million. Although neither of the couple had worked, on account of the income available to them from the wife’s shares, they lived modestly.

The husband’s assets were approximately £300,000, which consisted mainly of the family home, which was transferred to his sole name. He wished to sell that house and to purchase instead a property in Regent’s Park, valued at an estimated £2 million. He also proposed to buy a second home in Israel for £450,000 and a new car costing £60,000, and claimed that he would require maintenance of more than £100,000 per year to fund his lifestyle – an amount which greatly exceeded the couple’s annual outgoings when they were together.

The wife made an offer of £5 million to her husband, but he sought an additional sum to enable him to accomplish his aims. The Court of Appeal rejected his claim, however, holding that the initial offer was based on a generous assessment of his needs.

Click here for a guide to the financial aspects of divorce.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.