Latest News

Emigrating and Tax Emigrating and Tax
Executor Who Stole From Estate Faces Prison Executor Who Stole From Estate Faces Prison
Clarification on the Interpretation of the FSM Act 2000 Clarification on the Interpretation of the FSM Act 2000
Rights Lost if Easement Not Enforced Rights Lost if Easement Not Enforced
'It's Been in the Family For Years' is No Argument 'It's Been in the Family For Years' is No Argument
IHT Determined by Open Market Value IHT Determined by Open Market Value
OFT Will Writers' Code of Practice: A Welcome First Step OFT Will Writers' Code of Practice: A Welcome First Step
Canoe Fraudsters Must Repay Nearly £600,000 Canoe Fraudsters Must Repay Nearly £600,000
New Rights for House Buyers New Rights for House Buyers
Statute of Limitations Doesn't Affect Maintenance Penalties Statute of Limitations Doesn't Affect Maintenance Penalties

Biology 'Only a Contributor' In Deciding Child Custody

The Supreme Court has recently ruled to give the grandmother of a child custody over him despite the opposition of the boy’s father, who applied to have custody himself.

In the view of the Court, acting in the child’s best interests means that 'it is only as a contributor to the child’s welfare that parenthood assumes any significance’.

The child’s father was an ex-prisoner and his mother had problems with excessive drinking. The boy had been looked after by his grandmother since birth and a social worker considered him to be ‘thriving’ under her care.

When his biological parents applied for residence orders, the Court considered the boy’s bonds to his grandmother to be strong enough to reject their applications, despite the father having been assessed as capable of meeting the boy’s needs.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.