Latest News

Mandatory Eviction Powers for Local Authorities? Mandatory Eviction Powers for Local Authorities?
Swiss Bank Accounts - 6,000 Letters on the Way Swiss Bank Accounts - 6,000 Letters on the Way
Long-Term Sickness and the Accrual of Annual Leave Long-Term Sickness and the Accrual of Annual Leave
Unauthorised Database Use to Cost Companies Unauthorised Database Use to Cost Companies
Directors Who Misled Creditor Personally Liable Directors Who Misled Creditor Personally Liable
Court Refuses HMRC Right of Appeal in Tax Avoidance Case Court Refuses HMRC Right of Appeal in Tax Avoidance Case
Disability - Reasonable Adjustments and Their Chance of Success Disability - Reasonable Adjustments and Their Chance of Success
HMRC and ICAEW Announcements - Landlords Take Note HMRC and ICAEW Announcements - Landlords Take Note
Cookie Consent - Are You Prepared? Cookie Consent - Are You Prepared?
First Conviction Under the Bribery Act First Conviction Under the Bribery Act

Village Green Decision Supplies Blueprint for Stymieing Development

Most people – and certainly those who have been involved in an opposed planning application – know what a NIMBY is but, following a case heard in the Supreme Court, we may now see the rise of NOOViGs (not on our village greens). The reason for this was the victory of a group of residents in Redcar, who wished to oppose a proposal to develop land which included part of what had been a golf course.

They did so by applying for the land in question to be registered as a village green under a procedure set out in the Commons Act 2006. This allows land to be registered as a village green if ‘a significant number of the inhabitants of any locality, or any neighbourhood within a locality, have indulged as of right in lawful sports or pastimes on the land for a period of 20 years’.

The land was used by members of the public for recreation. If whilst out walking they encountered golfers in the course of play, it was common practice for them to wait until play was finished or until the golfers signalled for them to pass.

The original planning application was approved by the inspector, largely because he recognised the superior right of golf club members to use the land compared with the general public. This meant that the general public had not used that part of the land ‘as of right’.

However, the Supreme Court took a different view, ruling that the legislation was concerned with the nature of the use of the land and it was not necessary to examine whether the users of the land believed they had the right to use it as they did. What mattered was whether a significant number of members of the public had openly used the land for recreational purposes without any formal agreement for its use and without the landowner taking steps to assert its right to prevent it.

Applying that test, the deference showed to the golfers was a matter of normal civility and did not indicate that the non-golfing users of the land were not using it as of right.

The decision is likely to be used as a blueprint for arguments against developments elsewhere as NOOViGs seek to use the Act to prevent unpopular development projects. Registration of land as a village green will act, in effect, as a permanent block on development.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.