Latest News

Services - Should the Landlord Charge VAT? Services - Should the Landlord Charge VAT?
HMRC In Line for £160 Million Windfall After Salary Sacrifice Scheme Rejected HMRC In Line for £160 Million Windfall After Salary Sacrifice Scheme Rejected
Online Payment of VAT Online Payment of VAT
Holiday Lettings - Get Ready for New Rules Holiday Lettings - Get Ready for New Rules
Capital Allowances Reminder Capital Allowances Reminder
Restaurants Now in HMRC's Sights Restaurants Now in HMRC's Sights
Swiss Bank Accounts - 6,000 Letters on the Way Swiss Bank Accounts - 6,000 Letters on the Way
Court Refuses HMRC Right of Appeal in Tax Avoidance Case Court Refuses HMRC Right of Appeal in Tax Avoidance Case
Salary Sacrifice - VAT Changes Salary Sacrifice - VAT Changes
Integrating the Operation of Income Tax and NICs Integrating the Operation of Income Tax and NICs

Statistically Invalid Estimate Still Enforceable, Rules Tribunal

When it comes to contesting tax assessments, the playing field is far from level, as a recent VAT case shows.

HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) made assessments on a trader based on discrepancies between recorded sales and cash in the tills on two visits. The assessments were made to cover a six-year period.

In appealing against the assessments, the trader obtained an expert report from a statistician, who gave evidence that to extrapolate from such a small amount of data in the way HMRC had done was statistically invalid.

The First-Tier Tribunal rejected the trader’s claim and an appeal was made to the Upper Tribunal on the ground that the First-Tier Tribunal had ignored the expert evidence. The Upper Tribunal rejected that assertion and dismissed the appeal. The Tribunal was entitled to prefer HMRC’s evidence, which was that their estimate was based on the evidence available to them, despite the fact that this was not statistically valid.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.