Latest News

Unauthorised Database Use to Cost Companies Unauthorised Database Use to Cost Companies
Cookie Consent - Are You Prepared? Cookie Consent - Are You Prepared?
Are Your Website Images Legal? Are Your Website Images Legal?
Sophistication of Consumers Stymies Claim Sophistication of Consumers Stymies Claim
Overall Impression Test Means Court Rejects Virgin's Claim Overall Impression Test Means Court Rejects Virgin's Claim
Money Saving Expert Wins Trade Mark Battle Money Saving Expert Wins Trade Mark Battle
Easier Access to Justice to Enforce Patent and Design Rights Easier Access to Justice to Enforce Patent and Design Rights
Nuisance Callers and Spammers Face Increased Penalties Nuisance Callers and Spammers Face Increased Penalties
Court Condemns Unfair Product Comparison Court Condemns Unfair Product Comparison
How Do I Enforce My Copyright? How Do I Enforce My Copyright?

Key Words Do Not Breach Trade Mark

The Advocate General has recently given his opinion that the use of a competitor’s trade mark as a ‘key word’, in order to trigger the appearance of one’s own advertisement when an Internet search is carried out, is not an infringement of the owner’s trade mark.

Key words are used to guide Internet searches to websites, so the use of a competitor’s name to bring searchers for their products to another website is relatively commonplace.

Following a legal action against Google, the Advocate General concluded that Google’s use of trade marks as key words to trigger adverts was permissible. However, he was at pains to point out that use of visible trade marks within the adverts (key words are normally placed so that they are invisible to visitors to the site but visible to web search engines) would be an infringement.

The opinion will be welcome to Google and many advertisers, as key words are the basis under which Google’s ‘AdWords’ service operates. This service allows advertisers to place advertisements on results pages of web searches, driven by the words used for the search.

However, the Advocate General’s opinion (which is not binding) has been widely criticised and it is possible that it will not be followed when the case is decided by the European Court.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.