Latest News

Time Off Work for Jury Service Time Off Work for Jury Service
Contract Clinches Fee for Ex-Advisers Contract Clinches Fee for Ex-Advisers
Failure to Enforce Right Leads to its Loss Failure to Enforce Right Leads to its Loss
Voucher Warning for Firms Voucher Warning for Firms
Assessment of Repetitive Tasks Tool Assessment of Repetitive Tasks Tool
ET1 Claim Forms and Illegibility ET1 Claim Forms and Illegibility
It's Good to Talk It's Good to Talk
Businessmen Denied Profit for 'Borrowed' Business Plan Businessmen Denied Profit for 'Borrowed' Business Plan
Fines for Breaches of Environmental Law Fines for Breaches of Environmental Law
Employer Not Liable for Remark Made by Agency Worker Employer Not Liable for Remark Made by Agency Worker

Employee Ordered to Repay £150,000 in Fraud Case

An accountant who stole nearly £900,000 from his employer over a 10-year period was ordered to repay £150,000 (the maximum amount of assets available for seizure) and was sentenced to three years in prison.

The employee used his illicit gains to collect sporting memorabilia, including racing helmets signed by Ayrton Senna and Michael Schumacher, and to fund an extravagant lifestyle.

Thefts by trusted employees are surprisingly common and can be devastating for the businesses involved. In this case, the compensation paid was £¾ million less than the amount stolen. This is not unusual as in many such cases sums stolen are used to fund an expensive lifestyle.

Click here for advice on reducing the risk of employee fraud.

Click here for guidance on the warning signs of potential employee fraud.

There are risks in taking an overzealous approach to supervising employees, however, as such action could trigger a claim for constructive dismissal. If you have suspicions about an employee, take advice before taking action.
View my profile
Nigel Harrison
Partner
E:  
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.